Zdravo,
sem pošiljam novice glede diskusije o neprimernem naslavljanju spolenga
nasilja (in drugiih tem) na oddelku za psihologijo. Za vse, ki ne poznate
cele zgodbe, s katero se je vse skupaj začelo, sem spisala opis dogodka:
*Na vajah za svetovanje in psihoterapijo smo diskutirali o zaupnosti
informacij med klientom in terapevtom in katere informacije ter v katerih
kontekstih jih terapevt sme razkriti zunanjim osebam. Asistentka nam je
predstavila konkreten primer etične dileme:*
*Klientka (16 let) je na terapiji zaupala nekaj, kar jo je težilo. S
prijateljico sta bili na zabavi. Ta je popila precej veliko alkohola in se
družila s 3 starejšimi moškimi (ok. 30 let). Ti so nato imeli z njo spolni
odnos, a se dekle tega ne spomni (tako pravi).*
*Na vajah smo diskutirali, ali lahko kot terapevt kakorkoli ukrepamo.
Večina študentk in profesorica je zagovarjala mnenje, da to ni stvar
terapevta, ter da nismo dolžni ukrepati. *
*Jaz sem se izpostavila in predlagala, da bi od klientke skušali izvedeti
več oz. se pozanimati pri zunanjih virih, do kam seže naša pravica in
dolžnnost ukrepati. Na to je asistentka odgovorila, da ne moremo vedeti,
ali je dekle želela imeti spolni odnos in da ne moremo sklepati, da je šlo
za posilstvo.*
*Jaz sem rekla, da če dekle ni reklo JA, je to bilo posilstvo in se mi zdi
bolje, da sprožimo postopek na policiji in se kasneje izkaže, da je šlo za
lažni alarm, kot da ignoriramo sum na posilstvo. V odgovor na to se je k
meni obrnila sošolka in me vprašala »A ti vsakič preden spiš s svojim
partnerjem rečeš JA?« (smeh sošolcev) Vprašanje me je precej šokiralo in
nisem vedela, kako naj odreagiram. Druga sošolka je nadaljevala s šalo
»Hahaha predstavljajte si, da daš partnerju pred vsakim odnosom pisni
formular za podpisat!« (smeh sošolcev in asistentke). Na tem mestu sem
prenehala zagovarjati svoj argument, ker sem se počutila, kot da
pretiravam. *
O tem smo diskutirali na srečanju krožka pred enim tednom in se odločili,
da ne bomo pustili, da pozabimo na ta dogodek. Poiskali smo nekaj
mehanizmov, prek katerih lahko ukrepamo, in sicer poslali bomo poziv
študentkam in študentskim društvom na FF, naj delijo podobne
izkušnje/opažanja. Dobljeno želimo nato analizirati in predstaviti v sejah
ŠSFF in oddelčnih sejah ter pripraviti podcast na to temo v okviru Pan!ke.
Včeraj sem se o tem pogovorila z dr. Jasno Podreka z oddelka za
sociologijo. Bila je zelo ogorčena nad ravnanjem asistentke oz. situacijo,
ki sem jo opisala. Zelo je bila spodbudna glede našega načrta in je
ponudila pomoč, če jo bomo potrebovali. Svetovala je, naj neprimerno
naslavljanje problematike poimenujemo »znanstvena kratkost« (gre za
nestrokovnost, tudi če ima profesor moralno sporno mnenje ga mora postaviti
za spoznanja znanosti in dolžnost, da pripravi svoje študente za korektno
delo, predvsem na področju v zdravstvu in sodnem izvedenstvu). V konkretni
situaciji bi morala asistentka znati razložiti kaj pomeni »JA POMENI JA«,
njen odziv (posmehovanje stereotipom) je bil izredno neprimeren in etično
sporen. Predlagala je tudi, da končno mnenje pride do dekanje, da je
seznanjena z splošno »atmosfero« na oddelku. Zelo dobro se ji zdi, da ne
iščemo grešnega kozla na oddelku, ampak da naslovimo problematiko kot nekaj
splošnega na oddelku. Če pa opazimo, da je nek profesor sistematično
problematičen, pa ga lahko tudi izpostavimo.
Toliko zaenkrat, z Mašo bova pa tekom dneva še poslali povezavo do osnutka
poziva študentkam in študentskim društvom.
Lp., Tina
P.S.: Upam, da vsi dobite sporočilo :)
Pozdrav vsem,
ste že kdaj poslušali delavce govoriti o delu? Še ne? Kako to?
Danes ob 21:30 v etru
<https://radiostudent.si/sites/all/libraries/rsplayer/player2.html> Radia
Študent, kasneje pa kadarkoli na tej
<https://radiostudent.si/znanost/psihoteka/o-psihologiji-dela-z-delavci>povezavi
lahko prisluhnete pogovoru z *Mirjano Janjić in Selmanom Hodžićem iz
Sindikata Tuš, Andražem Malijem iz Centra za družbeno raziskovanje (CEDRA)
ter Katjo Praznik iz Sindikata za ustvarjalnost in kulturo (ZASUK).*
Kako se upreti intenziviranju dela? Kako si izboriti boljše delovne pogoje?
Kako graditi razredno solidarnost in politizirati delavstvo? O vsem tem
tokrat z delavci, sindikalisti in tovariši.
Lepe praznike,
Marja
Zdravo!
v sredo, 21. decembra ob 18:00 nadaljujemo z branjem Danzingerjeve knjige
Constructing the Subject, tokrat
*8. poglavje: Investigative practice as a professional project*
Glede na to, da je trenutno aktualna in odprta še zadeva glede *poziva* v
zvezi z neustreznim obravnavanjem tematik spola in spolnega nasilja na
oddelku, je plan, da bralni del srečanja omejimo do cca 19:15, preostanek
časa pa namenimo diskusiji glede aktualnega poziva.
Tako da se lahko glede na interes in časovne omejitve pridružite bodisi
samo *bralnemu delu ob 18:00* bodisi samo *diskusiji v zvezi s pozivom po
19:00*, dobrodošle pa, da se udeležite obojega.
Kot vedno, hibridna izvedba. V živo ZRC SAZU. Na daljavo stalna povezava:
https://meet.jit.si/BralniKrozekKriticnePsihologije
Glede branja predlagam tudi razmislek o tem, ali bi zadnje branje (18. 1.),
ki je v času izpitnega obdobja, zavoljo večje udeležbe izvedle že prej.
Morda izvedemo eno srečanje v času med božičem in novim letom in zamaknemo
razpored, morda združimo poglavja, morda pustimo kot je. Samo v razmislek
pa se dogovorimo ob priliki.
*Razpored branj:*
21. 12. 8. poglavje (Investigative practice as a professional project)
4. 1. 9. in 10. poglavje (From quantification to methodolatry &
Investigating persons)
18. 1. 11. poglavje (The social construction of psychological knowledge)
Zdravo,
pošiljam zapisnik današnjega srečanja. V njem so zadnji dogovori o poteku dela pred pričetkom zbiranja podatkov o neprimerni obravnavi nasilja in neenakosti na oddelku.
Lep pozdrav,
Jerica
Hej,
v sredo, 14. 12. 2022 je ob 18:00 na sporedu ponovno pogovorno srečanje.
Tokrat predelujemo 6. vodilo + dodatek priročnika Constructive criticism.
Če je potreben kak update, dogovor, obvestilo o domači nalogi, dajte prosim
napisati v to nit tiste_i, ki ste bile_i prisotne_i na prejšnji
konstruktivni kritiki (ali pa če je kaj od zadnjič iz bralnega srečanja za
sporočiti),
V živo se dobimo na ZRC SAZU v študentski sobi, na daljavo na stalni
povezavi: https://meet.jit.si/BralniKrozekKriticnePsihologije
Razpored referatov:
14. 12. Praktična izvedba in kritično ovrednotenje 6. vodila in dodatnih
nasvetov
11. 1. Evalvacija
Lepo bodite.
Katja
Zdravo!
v sredo, 7. decembra ob 18:00 nadaljujemo z branjem Danzingerjeve knjige
Constructing the Subject, tokrat dve poglavji:
- *6. poglavje: Identifying the subject in psychological research*;
-* 7. poglavje: Marketable methods*.
Javite, če bi prišle_i v živo, dajmo ne še čisto opustiti teh srečanj. Jaz
imam plan priti v živo. Glede lokacije bo bodisi IJS, Teslova 30 (bo Junoš
še potrdil) bodisi ZRC SAZU (potrdi Ana).
Na daljavo stalna povezava:
https://meet.jit.si/BralniKrozekKriticnePsihologije
*Razpored branj:*
7. 12. 6. in 7. poglavje (Identifying the subject in psychological research
& Marketable methods)
21. 12. 8. poglavje (Investigative practice as a professional project)
4. 1. 9. in 10. poglavje (From quantification to methodolatry &
Investigating persons)
18. 1. 11. poglavje (The social construction of psychological knowledge)
Posredujem, deluje obetavno!
Ana
---------- Forwarded message ---------
Od: Jasper Friedrich <jasper.friedrich(a)outlook.com>
Date: V pon., 5. dec. 2022 ob 09:44
Subject: CfA: Political Theory and Mental Health
To: <PHILOS-L(a)liverpool.ac.uk>
Dear all,
We are happy to invite abstract submissions for our workshop ‘Political
Theory and Mental Health’ as part of the conference ‘Political Theory in
Times of Uncertainty’ takin place in Bremen, Germany September 27-29, 2023.
Please send abstracts of max. 500 words to
jasper.friedrich(a)politics.ox.ac.uk by *January 8, 2023*.
*Panel description:*
In recent years, there has, especially in the Anglophone world, been much
talk of a ‘crisis’ of mental health. Yet, despite the existence of rich
traditions of theorizing across politics and psychology, political theory
has yet to deal with these contemporary issues of mental health in much
depth. How should we conceptualize this ‘crisis’ and its relation to other
crises faced by the contemporary world and the existential uncertainty that
comes with them? Is there a mental health crisis or just an ideological
medicalization of reasonable discontent with a crisis-ridden social system?
Can we see mental health issues as the subjective manifestation of the
various objective crises of capitalism? Or are we dealing more specifically
with a crisis of care and social reproduction? Does a solution to the
mental health ‘crisis’ need to involve the amelioration of the objective
conditions of uncertainty, or is it worth trying to equip individuals to
better be able to endure uncertainty? What role do mental health care and
the disciplines of psychology, psychoanalysis, and psychiatry play – and
what are their political stakes? In order to answer these questions, we
invite papers that theorize the connection between mental health and
politics. We are especially interested in interdisciplinary approaches that
combine political and social theory with, for instance, radical psychiatry,
philosophy of mind, Mad studies, or (critiques of) the traditional
psy-disciplines.
*Conference description:*
Without exaggeration, uncertainty can be described as the signature of our
time. Today, a multitude of crises and challenges confronts us with
uncertainty in an often existential manner: from the climate crisis to the
COVID pandemic, from the crises of neoliberal hegemony and liberal
democracies to the recently re-emerging conflicts about the distribution of
power in global society. Not only are possible solutions uncertain, but it
is also impossible to anticipate which new crises and challenges may arise
soon. This situation demands the reflection by political theory and the
history of ideas, as it brings political coping strategies to their limits
and casts doubt on established narratives of modern political theory. What
is needed, therefore, is an open exploration of problems beyond
well-rehearsed paradigmatic positions of contemporary political theory.
Uncertainty is not only a pressing problem of our time, but a constant
companion of the history of political thought – sometimes more and
sometimes less so. Reflecting on the problems of our time therefore not
only benefits from a synchronic look at the plural theoretical offerings of
the present, but also necessitates a diachronic look at the vicissitudes of
the history of political ideas. Moreover, the uncertainty of the present is
unquestionably a problem that cannot be approached solely through the
perspective of political theory in a narrow sense: exploratory dialogues
between political theory and other sub-disciplines of political science are
therefore not only appealing, but indispensable. Beyond the disciplinary
perspective of political science, it is essential to include other
disciplines that push beyond the narrow viewpoint of Western thought from
the outset: the uncertainties we are currently confronted with are mostly
global problems, and they belong to a world which is itself characterized
by massive inequalities, power asymmetries, conflicts, and epistemic
dissonances that not only amplify the uncertainties and insecurities, but
also constitute them in the first place. The congress takes this complex
and challenging situation as an opportunity to invite a joint reflection on
the problem. It is open to contributions from all directions and paradigms
of political theory and the history of ideas placing a strong emphasis on
the exchange between political theory and other sub- and neighbouring
disciplines. Formats that bring political theory and other sub- or
neighbouring disciplines of political science into a cooperative or
controversial dialogue, and that involve international colleagues are
therefore particularly welcome. Colleagues interested in theory from other
areas of political science or other disciplines are warmly invited to
submit proposals. The congress is organized by the Section for Political
Theory and History of Ideas of the German Political Science Association
(DVPW). Information can be found on the homepage of the congress:
http://www.timesofuncertainty.org/
Best regards,
Jasper Friedrich
Emily Dyson
Philos-L "The Liverpool List" is run by the Department of Philosophy,
University of Liverpool https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/philosophy/philos-l/
Messages to the list are archived at
http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html. Recent posts can also be
read in a Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/PhilosL/ Follow the list
on Twitter @PhilosL. Follow the Department of Philosophy @LiverpoolPhilos
To sign off the list send a blank message to
philos-l-unsubscribe-request(a)liverpool.ac.uk.
--
To sporočilo ste prejeli, ker ste naročeni na skupino »all kinds of project
calls« v Google Skupinah.
Če se želite odjaviti od skupine in ne želite več prejemati njenih
e-poštnih sporočil, pišite na naslov
all-kinds-of-project-calls+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
Če si želite ogledati to razpravo v spletu, obiščite spletno stran
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/all-kinds-of-project-calls/CALvucYYrif9AP…
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/all-kinds-of-project-calls/CALvucYYrif9AP…>
.
