December 2022 - Kriticna-psihologija

Neprimerno naslavljanje spolnega nasilja na oddelku za psihologijo
by Tina Kuhar 23 Jan '23

23 Jan '23

Zdravo, sem pošiljam novice glede diskusije o neprimernem naslavljanju spolenga nasilja (in drugiih tem) na oddelku za psihologijo. Za vse, ki ne poznate cele zgodbe, s katero se je vse skupaj začelo, sem spisala opis dogodka: *Na vajah za svetovanje in psihoterapijo smo diskutirali o zaupnosti informacij med klientom in terapevtom in katere informacije ter v katerih kontekstih jih terapevt sme razkriti zunanjim osebam. Asistentka nam je predstavila konkreten primer etične dileme:* *Klientka (16 let) je na terapiji zaupala nekaj, kar jo je težilo. S prijateljico sta bili na zabavi. Ta je popila precej veliko alkohola in se družila s 3 starejšimi moškimi (ok. 30 let). Ti so nato imeli z njo spolni odnos, a se dekle tega ne spomni (tako pravi).* *Na vajah smo diskutirali, ali lahko kot terapevt kakorkoli ukrepamo. Večina študentk in profesorica je zagovarjala mnenje, da to ni stvar terapevta, ter da nismo dolžni ukrepati. * *Jaz sem se izpostavila in predlagala, da bi od klientke skušali izvedeti več oz. se pozanimati pri zunanjih virih, do kam seže naša pravica in dolžnnost ukrepati. Na to je asistentka odgovorila, da ne moremo vedeti, ali je dekle želela imeti spolni odnos in da ne moremo sklepati, da je šlo za posilstvo.* *Jaz sem rekla, da če dekle ni reklo JA, je to bilo posilstvo in se mi zdi bolje, da sprožimo postopek na policiji in se kasneje izkaže, da je šlo za lažni alarm, kot da ignoriramo sum na posilstvo. V odgovor na to se je k meni obrnila sošolka in me vprašala »A ti vsakič preden spiš s svojim partnerjem rečeš JA?« (smeh sošolcev) Vprašanje me je precej šokiralo in nisem vedela, kako naj odreagiram. Druga sošolka je nadaljevala s šalo »Hahaha predstavljajte si, da daš partnerju pred vsakim odnosom pisni formular za podpisat!« (smeh sošolcev in asistentke). Na tem mestu sem prenehala zagovarjati svoj argument, ker sem se počutila, kot da pretiravam. * O tem smo diskutirali na srečanju krožka pred enim tednom in se odločili, da ne bomo pustili, da pozabimo na ta dogodek. Poiskali smo nekaj mehanizmov, prek katerih lahko ukrepamo, in sicer poslali bomo poziv študentkam in študentskim društvom na FF, naj delijo podobne izkušnje/opažanja. Dobljeno želimo nato analizirati in predstaviti v sejah ŠSFF in oddelčnih sejah ter pripraviti podcast na to temo v okviru Pan!ke. Včeraj sem se o tem pogovorila z dr. Jasno Podreka z oddelka za sociologijo. Bila je zelo ogorčena nad ravnanjem asistentke oz. situacijo, ki sem jo opisala. Zelo je bila spodbudna glede našega načrta in je ponudila pomoč, če jo bomo potrebovali. Svetovala je, naj neprimerno naslavljanje problematike poimenujemo »znanstvena kratkost« (gre za nestrokovnost, tudi če ima profesor moralno sporno mnenje ga mora postaviti za spoznanja znanosti in dolžnost, da pripravi svoje študente za korektno delo, predvsem na področju v zdravstvu in sodnem izvedenstvu). V konkretni situaciji bi morala asistentka znati razložiti kaj pomeni »JA POMENI JA«, njen odziv (posmehovanje stereotipom) je bil izredno neprimeren in etično sporen. Predlagala je tudi, da končno mnenje pride do dekanje, da je seznanjena z splošno »atmosfero« na oddelku. Zelo dobro se ji zdi, da ne iščemo grešnega kozla na oddelku, ampak da naslovimo problematiko kot nekaj splošnega na oddelku. Če pa opazimo, da je nek profesor sistematično problematičen, pa ga lahko tudi izpostavimo. Toliko zaenkrat, z Mašo bova pa tekom dneva še poslali povezavo do osnutka poziva študentkam in študentskim društvom. Lp., Tina P.S.: Upam, da vsi dobite sporočilo :)

14 41

Danes ob 21:30 Psihoteka - O psihologiji dela z delavci
by Marja Z 22 Dec '22

22 Dec '22

Pozdrav vsem, ste že kdaj poslušali delavce govoriti o delu? Še ne? Kako to? Danes ob 21:30 v etru <https://radiostudent.si/sites/all/libraries/rsplayer/player2.html> Radia Študent, kasneje pa kadarkoli na tej <https://radiostudent.si/znanost/psihoteka/o-psihologiji-dela-z-delavci>povezavi lahko prisluhnete pogovoru z *Mirjano Janjić in Selmanom Hodžićem iz Sindikata Tuš, Andražem Malijem iz Centra za družbeno raziskovanje (CEDRA) ter Katjo Praznik iz Sindikata za ustvarjalnost in kulturo (ZASUK).* Kako se upreti intenziviranju dela? Kako si izboriti boljše delovne pogoje? Kako graditi razredno solidarnost in politizirati delavstvo? O vsem tem tokrat z delavci, sindikalisti in tovariši. Lepe praznike, Marja

1 0

Danzinger #6 + debata o pozivu glede obravnave spolnega nasilja na oddelku
by Katja Skoda 21 Dec '22

21 Dec '22

Zdravo! v sredo, 21. decembra ob 18:00 nadaljujemo z branjem Danzingerjeve knjige Constructing the Subject, tokrat *8. poglavje: Investigative practice as a professional project* Glede na to, da je trenutno aktualna in odprta še zadeva glede *poziva* v zvezi z neustreznim obravnavanjem tematik spola in spolnega nasilja na oddelku, je plan, da bralni del srečanja omejimo do cca 19:15, preostanek časa pa namenimo diskusiji glede aktualnega poziva. Tako da se lahko glede na interes in časovne omejitve pridružite bodisi samo *bralnemu delu ob 18:00* bodisi samo *diskusiji v zvezi s pozivom po 19:00*, dobrodošle pa, da se udeležite obojega. Kot vedno, hibridna izvedba. V živo ZRC SAZU. Na daljavo stalna povezava: https://meet.jit.si/BralniKrozekKriticnePsihologije Glede branja predlagam tudi razmislek o tem, ali bi zadnje branje (18. 1.), ki je v času izpitnega obdobja, zavoljo večje udeležbe izvedle že prej. Morda izvedemo eno srečanje v času med božičem in novim letom in zamaknemo razpored, morda združimo poglavja, morda pustimo kot je. Samo v razmislek pa se dogovorimo ob priliki. *Razpored branj:* 21. 12. 8. poglavje (Investigative practice as a professional project) 4. 1. 9. in 10. poglavje (From quantification to methodolatry & Investigating persons) 18. 1. 11. poglavje (The social construction of psychological knowledge)

1 1

Zapisnik 14. 12.
by Jerica Peric 14 Dec '22

14 Dec '22

Zdravo, pošiljam zapisnik današnjega srečanja. V njem so zadnji dogovori o poteku dela pred pričetkom zbiranja podatkov o neprimerni obravnavi nasilja in neenakosti na oddelku. Lep pozdrav, Jerica

1 0

KONSTRUKTIVNA KRITIKA #5
by Katja Skoda 14 Dec '22

14 Dec '22

Hej, v sredo, 14. 12. 2022 je ob 18:00 na sporedu ponovno pogovorno srečanje. Tokrat predelujemo 6. vodilo + dodatek priročnika Constructive criticism. Če je potreben kak update, dogovor, obvestilo o domači nalogi, dajte prosim napisati v to nit tiste_i, ki ste bile_i prisotne_i na prejšnji konstruktivni kritiki (ali pa če je kaj od zadnjič iz bralnega srečanja za sporočiti), V živo se dobimo na ZRC SAZU v študentski sobi, na daljavo na stalni povezavi: https://meet.jit.si/BralniKrozekKriticnePsihologije Razpored referatov: 14. 12. Praktična izvedba in kritično ovrednotenje 6. vodila in dodatnih nasvetov 11. 1. Evalvacija Lepo bodite. Katja

3 5

Danzinger #5
by Katja Skoda 07 Dec '22

07 Dec '22

Zdravo! v sredo, 7. decembra ob 18:00 nadaljujemo z branjem Danzingerjeve knjige Constructing the Subject, tokrat dve poglavji: - *6. poglavje: Identifying the subject in psychological research*; -* 7. poglavje: Marketable methods*. Javite, če bi prišle_i v živo, dajmo ne še čisto opustiti teh srečanj. Jaz imam plan priti v živo. Glede lokacije bo bodisi IJS, Teslova 30 (bo Junoš še potrdil) bodisi ZRC SAZU (potrdi Ana). Na daljavo stalna povezava: https://meet.jit.si/BralniKrozekKriticnePsihologije *Razpored branj:* 7. 12. 6. in 7. poglavje (Identifying the subject in psychological research & Marketable methods) 21. 12. 8. poglavje (Investigative practice as a professional project) 4. 1. 9. in 10. poglavje (From quantification to methodolatry & Investigating persons) 18. 1. 11. poglavje (The social construction of psychological knowledge)

3 3

Fwd: CfA: Political Theory and Mental Health
by Ana Reberc 05 Dec '22

05 Dec '22

Posredujem, deluje obetavno! Ana ---------- Forwarded message --------- Od: Jasper Friedrich <jasper.friedrich(a)outlook.com> Date: V pon., 5. dec. 2022 ob 09:44 Subject: CfA: Political Theory and Mental Health To: <PHILOS-L(a)liverpool.ac.uk> Dear all, We are happy to invite abstract submissions for our workshop ‘Political Theory and Mental Health’ as part of the conference ‘Political Theory in Times of Uncertainty’ takin place in Bremen, Germany September 27-29, 2023. Please send abstracts of max. 500 words to jasper.friedrich(a)politics.ox.ac.uk by *January 8, 2023*. *Panel description:* In recent years, there has, especially in the Anglophone world, been much talk of a ‘crisis’ of mental health. Yet, despite the existence of rich traditions of theorizing across politics and psychology, political theory has yet to deal with these contemporary issues of mental health in much depth. How should we conceptualize this ‘crisis’ and its relation to other crises faced by the contemporary world and the existential uncertainty that comes with them? Is there a mental health crisis or just an ideological medicalization of reasonable discontent with a crisis-ridden social system? Can we see mental health issues as the subjective manifestation of the various objective crises of capitalism? Or are we dealing more specifically with a crisis of care and social reproduction? Does a solution to the mental health ‘crisis’ need to involve the amelioration of the objective conditions of uncertainty, or is it worth trying to equip individuals to better be able to endure uncertainty? What role do mental health care and the disciplines of psychology, psychoanalysis, and psychiatry play – and what are their political stakes? In order to answer these questions, we invite papers that theorize the connection between mental health and politics. We are especially interested in interdisciplinary approaches that combine political and social theory with, for instance, radical psychiatry, philosophy of mind, Mad studies, or (critiques of) the traditional psy-disciplines. *Conference description:* Without exaggeration, uncertainty can be described as the signature of our time. Today, a multitude of crises and challenges confronts us with uncertainty in an often existential manner: from the climate crisis to the COVID pandemic, from the crises of neoliberal hegemony and liberal democracies to the recently re-emerging conflicts about the distribution of power in global society. Not only are possible solutions uncertain, but it is also impossible to anticipate which new crises and challenges may arise soon. This situation demands the reflection by political theory and the history of ideas, as it brings political coping strategies to their limits and casts doubt on established narratives of modern political theory. What is needed, therefore, is an open exploration of problems beyond well-rehearsed paradigmatic positions of contemporary political theory. Uncertainty is not only a pressing problem of our time, but a constant companion of the history of political thought – sometimes more and sometimes less so. Reflecting on the problems of our time therefore not only benefits from a synchronic look at the plural theoretical offerings of the present, but also necessitates a diachronic look at the vicissitudes of the history of political ideas. Moreover, the uncertainty of the present is unquestionably a problem that cannot be approached solely through the perspective of political theory in a narrow sense: exploratory dialogues between political theory and other sub-disciplines of political science are therefore not only appealing, but indispensable. Beyond the disciplinary perspective of political science, it is essential to include other disciplines that push beyond the narrow viewpoint of Western thought from the outset: the uncertainties we are currently confronted with are mostly global problems, and they belong to a world which is itself characterized by massive inequalities, power asymmetries, conflicts, and epistemic dissonances that not only amplify the uncertainties and insecurities, but also constitute them in the first place. The congress takes this complex and challenging situation as an opportunity to invite a joint reflection on the problem. It is open to contributions from all directions and paradigms of political theory and the history of ideas placing a strong emphasis on the exchange between political theory and other sub- and neighbouring disciplines. Formats that bring political theory and other sub- or neighbouring disciplines of political science into a cooperative or controversial dialogue, and that involve international colleagues are therefore particularly welcome. Colleagues interested in theory from other areas of political science or other disciplines are warmly invited to submit proposals. The congress is organized by the Section for Political Theory and History of Ideas of the German Political Science Association (DVPW). Information can be found on the homepage of the congress: http://www.timesofuncertainty.org/ Best regards, Jasper Friedrich Emily Dyson Philos-L "The Liverpool List" is run by the Department of Philosophy, University of Liverpool https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/philosophy/philos-l/ Messages to the list are archived at http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html. Recent posts can also be read in a Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/PhilosL/ Follow the list on Twitter @PhilosL. Follow the Department of Philosophy @LiverpoolPhilos To sign off the list send a blank message to philos-l-unsubscribe-request(a)liverpool.ac.uk. -- To sporočilo ste prejeli, ker ste naročeni na skupino »all kinds of project calls« v Google Skupinah. Če se želite odjaviti od skupine in ne želite več prejemati njenih e-poštnih sporočil, pišite na naslov all-kinds-of-project-calls+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. Če si želite ogledati to razpravo v spletu, obiščite spletno stran https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/all-kinds-of-project-calls/CALvucYYrif9AP… <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/all-kinds-of-project-calls/CALvucYYrif9AP…> .

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

Kriticna-psihologija December 2022